Your analytics preferences

With your permission, we use optional analytics to understand website visits and improve our services. You can change your choice in the footer at any time.

EdTech

EdTech software development

We build learning platforms, assessment tools and school systems that cope with term-start traffic and fit how classrooms really run.

01EdTech

Learning platforms that teachers and students actually use

Education software has to fit the way teaching is delivered. A course marketplace needs discovery, purchases and creator payouts. A school platform needs enrolment, class membership and records that stay consistent across terms. A tutoring product needs the right curriculum, useful feedback and a clear boundary between what the assistant can answer and what a teacher should review. These are different products, even when they share a login screen.

We begin with the learner, educator and administrator journeys, including the work outside the classroom. Who creates a course? Who can change a result? What happens when a learner moves between groups? That operating model determines the permissions, data structure and integrations. We agree the first complete journey before adding a long feature list, so the initial release can be reviewed against a real educational task.

02Challenges

What makes EdTech software hard

  • 01

    Peak-load spikes

    Enrolment day and exam week bring ten times the normal traffic.

  • 02

    Fragmented tools

    LMS, student records, video and payments that don't share data.

  • 03

    Engagement drop-off

    Courses start strong and lose learners by week three.

  • 04

    Student data privacy

    Records covered by FERPA, GDPR and local education rules.

03What we build

EdTech solutions we deliver

  • 01

    Learning management systems

    Course delivery, progress tracking and content authoring built around your teaching model.

  • 02

    Assessment and proctoring

    Question banks, adaptive tests and grading workflows with integrity checks.

  • 03

    Student and parent portals

    Timetables, results, payments and messaging in one place.

  • 04

    Course marketplaces

    Catalogues, subscriptions and creator payouts for online courses.

  • 05

    AI tutoring and feedback

    Assistants that explain, quiz and give feedback, grounded in your curriculum.

  • 06

    Analytics for educators

    Dashboards that show which learners need help before they fall behind.

04Considerations

Built in from the first sprint

The requirements we plan for on every project in this sector.

  • FERPA, COPPA and GDPR-aware data handling
  • LTI and student information system integrations
  • Accessibility to WCAG 2.2 AA
  • Capacity for enrolment and exam peaks

05Delivery decisions

Integrations in practice

  • 01

    LMS and student records

    An LTI launch, a student information system and a course catalogue may refer to the same learner with different identifiers. We map enrolment, roles and course membership before connecting them. Tests cover changed classes, revoked access and failed synchronization as well as a successful first login. The existing institution remains the reference for the records it owns.

  • 02

    Content, assessment and payments

    Video delivery, question banks and subscriptions should agree on what a learner may access. We define entitlement and progress rules explicitly, including a refunded course or an interrupted assessment. Payment success alone should not be the only evidence that access was granted. The release needs a way to reconcile payment, enrolment and content records.

  • 03

    AI connected to the curriculum

    A tutor that searches approved learning material solves a different problem from a general chatbot. We define which sources it can use, how it cites them and when it hands a question to an educator. Evaluation uses representative curriculum questions and examples of missing or unsuitable material, so the behaviour can be examined before students rely on it.

06Delivery decisions

How we verify the work

We test complete journeys for each role: an administrator enrolling a learner, an educator publishing an assessment and a learner completing it on a supported device. Accessibility is part of those journeys, including keyboard use, error messages and understandable progress. Peak-load scenarios reflect the enrolment or exam events in your own operating calendar; we do not invent a traffic target for a proposal.

Student data handling needs explicit decisions about permissions, retention, exports and deletion. The relevant legal and institutional requirements are mapped with your stakeholders rather than inferred from a logo or a feature checklist. Handover includes the configuration, integration contracts and release procedures your team needs to keep the learning platform operating after launch.

09FAQ

Frequently asked questions

View pricing guide
Can you integrate with our LMS?

Yes. We work with Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard and others through LTI and their APIs.

Do you build for schools as well as universities?

Yes, along with corporate training providers and online course businesses.

How do you plan student-data requirements?

We identify the data collected, who may access it and the retention or deletion rules with your institution. The agreed requirements guide permissions, audit records and integrations. Engineering controls support the compliance work; the institution's legal and privacy responsibilities still need their own review.

Can you improve an existing education product?

Yes. We first review the code, data model and LMS connections, then identify a release boundary that can improve without disrupting current learners. Where replacement is needed, the plan includes record reconciliation, compatibility and a rollback route rather than an unexplained full rewrite.

How do you estimate cost and delivery time?

We scope the learner and educator journeys, integrations, content formats, access rules and expected usage before estimating. The pricing guide gives ranges for relevant product and integration work. A written proposal confirms the release scope and dependencies; a sector label alone is not enough to price a platform.

How are AI tutoring features evaluated?

We agree representative curriculum questions, acceptable answer behaviour and escalation rules with the people responsible for learning quality. Tests include questions the material cannot answer and content a learner should not access. Educator review remains part of the workflow where the agreed risk requires it.

EdTech

Building something in EdTech?

Tell us what you're planning. We'll share what we've learned from similar projects and suggest a sensible first step.